ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026
Self-disclosure to Peers and Changes in Personal Recovery in Community-dwelling People with Mental Disorders: A One-year Longitudinal Study.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined whether overall and domain-specific self-disclosure to peers at baseline was prospectively associated with changes in personal recovery over one-year among community-dwelling adults with mental disorders in Japan. A longitudinal questionnaire survey was conducted among adults with mental disorders. Self-disclosure was assessed using the Self-Disclosure Scale for People with Mental Illness, and personal recovery was measured with the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale. Linear mixed-effects models were used to examine recovery at baseline and at one-year follow-up as a continuous outcome, including time, baseline self-disclosure, and their interaction, with random intercepts for participants. Models were adjusted for age, sex, and service utilization. Fifty-four participants (mean age = 41.1 years; 48% female) responded to both the baseline and follow-up surveys. Mean recovery scores did not change significantly over one year. In domain-specific analyses, greater baseline self-disclosure about mental illness and psychiatric disability was associated with less positive changes in recovery over one year (Estimate = - 4.162, SE = 1.589, 95% CI [- 7.316, - 1.008], p = 0.010). Conversely, no significant time-by-disclosure interactions were observed for the other disclosure domains (life conditions, own strengths, and experiences of distress). Among community-dwelling people with mental disorders, baseline self-disclosure about mental illness and psychiatric disability to peers was associated with less positive changes in personal recovery over one year, whereas the other disclosure domains were not significantly associated with changes over time. These findings suggest that disclosure about mental illness and psychiatric disability in peer contexts may have context-dependent implications. Moreover, they underscore the importance of fostering safe and supportive peer environments that respond constructively to such disclosures within recovery-oriented care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42171961What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.