Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42171948›Full record

ReviewCurrent nutrition reports2026

The Use of Edible Insect Species Tenebrio molitor (Mealworm), Acheta domesticus (House Cricket), and Hermetia illucens (Black Soldier Fly) in the Food Industry: Nutritional Value, Safety Profile, and Consumer Acceptance.

Simge Cankaya, Hande Mortaş

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current nutrition reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Simge CankayaInstitute of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Gazi University, Ankara, 06490, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0005-1046-2094
Hande MortaşFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Gazi University, Ankara, 06490, Türkiye. handeyilmaz@gazi.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0001-6356-5226

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review aims to explore the role of edible insects as an alternative protein source in the food industry, focusing on their nutritional value, processing feasibility, food safety, and consumer acceptance. It provides an integrative perspective on how edible insects can contribute to sustainable food systems while addressing challenges related to consumer perception and regulatory frameworks. RECENT

findingsRecent studies have demonstrated that key edible insect species such as Tenebrio molitor, Acheta domesticus, and Hermetia illucens L. exhibit high protein content, favorable amino acid profiles, optimal omega-3/6 fatty acid ratios, and excellent bioavailability. Processing techniques including drying, extrusion, fermentation, and isolated protein production have been shown to influence both nutritional quality and microbiological safety. Moreover, consumer acceptance studies highlight that attitudes toward insect consumption are shaped by perceived benefits, disgust sensitivity, ethical considerations, and cultural familiarity. Edible insects present a promising alternative protein source with significant nutritional and environmental advantages. However, large-scale industrial adoption requires the combined development of scientific evidence, standardized regulations, and effective consumer education strategies. By integrating nutritional, technological, and psychosocial dimensions, this review provides a comprehensive understanding of the potential of edible insects in advancing sustainable food systems.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorEdible InsectsFood IndustryFood SafetyGryllidaeNutritive ValueSimuliidaeTenebrioAnimalsDietary ProteinsFood HandlingHumansDietary ProteinsAlternative protein sourcesBioavailabilityConsumer acceptanceEdible insects (entomophagy)Food safetyProcessing technologiesProtein quality (DIAAS/PDCAAS)

Identifiers

PMID42171948
PMCPMC13197351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.