ArticleEJNMMI research2026
Simultaneous partial volume correction and denoising of brain PET images, using transformers and transfer learning.
Article in EJNMMI research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPositron emission tomography (PET) is a key tool for quantitative brain imaging, but its image quality and quantitative reliability are strongly dependent on injected radiotracer activity and acquisition time. Reducing injected dose or acquisition time lowers radiation exposure but increases image noise, while partial volume effects (PVE) further degrade signal accuracy, especially in cortical regions critical for neurodegenerative disease assessment. Conventional partial volume correction (PVC) methods such as Iterative Yang can improve quantification but are highly sensitive to noise and perform poorly in low count settings, while also relying on accurate anatomical information, typically derived from MRI, which may be unavailable, misregistered, or impractical in routine clinical workflows; in parallel, most deep learning (DL) approaches reported to date focus mainly on denoising and do not jointly address PVE. A method capable of simultaneously mitigating low count noise and PVE is needed. This study aimed to evaluate whether a DL approach can generate full count, PVC brain PET images from fast or low count non PVC scans, using both clinical and phantom datasets.
resultsUsing clinical and phantom brain PET datasets with
conclusionsOur study introduced a DL based PVC method based on Transformer and Unet architectures. By combining phantom and clinical data through a transfer learning strategy, the network benefits from the phantom ground truth activity maps while also learning the complexities present in real clinical PET. With this approach, it improves PET image quality and quantitative agreement with a high count reference, and at inference it requires only PET input, so it can be deployed without MR images for PVC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.