ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Estimating marginal effects with zero-inflated models: A tutorial with the R package mzim.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Count data in the psychological and health sciences are often characterized by an excess of zero values, a feature known as zero inflation. While traditional zero-inflated models, such as the zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) and zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB), were developed to handle such data, they present challenges for applied researchers. Standard count models can produce biased estimates, and the dual-parameter output of traditional zero-inflated models provides conditional effects for a latent-at-risk subpopulation, complicating interpretation and often failing to answer research questions about the entire population directly. To address these limitations, marginalized zero-inflated (mZI) models directly estimate the population-averaged effect, yielding a single, interpretable coefficient for each predictor's overall effect. However, the adoption of mZI models has been hindered by the lack of an accessible software package. The current study has two objectives: first, it provides a tutorial on the theory, estimation, and interpretation of marginalized zero-inflated models. Second, it introduces mzim, a new R package designed to make both marginalized zero-inflated Poisson (mZIP) and Negative Binomial (mZINB) models readily accessible. Using an empirical example on self-reported youth abuse experiences, we demonstrate a complete workflow with the mzim package and compare the results from the mZINB model to traditional approaches, highlighting the practical benefits of the marginalized framework for applied researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.