ArticleBehavior research methods2026
The talking heads attentional bias assessment task: A readily available, reliable, and effective task for assessing attentional bias.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive theories contend that attentional bias to negative information contributes to elevated trait anxiety. However, research in this area has been hindered by the lack of a standardized assessment task that demonstrates the required qualities, including strong internal consistency and ecological validity. The present study aimed to develop and validate the Talking Heads Attentional Bias Assessment Task, an easy-to-implement measure that overcomes the limitations of previous attentional bias assessment tasks. The task employs video-based stimuli conveying emotionally negative or benign information about issues individuals commonly encounter in their daily lives and uses a dual-probe methodology to assess attentional bias. A sample of 168 undergraduate students completed the task along with measures of trait and state anxiety. The results demonstrated that the attentional bias index derived from the task showed excellent internal consistency across multiple reliability assessment methods. Greater attentional bias to negative information was also significantly associated with greater trait anxiety, confirming the task's sensitivity to anxiety-linked individual differences in such attentional bias. Furthermore, mediation analyses revealed that attentional bias mediated the association between trait anxiety and state anxiety elevation in response to emotional information. We discuss the study's important theoretical and methodological implications, and convey the task's capacity to enhance assessment of attentional bias across a wide range of psychological domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.