ArticleInfection2026
Evaluation of ambulance blood cultures in patients with suspected sepsis. A rural prospective cohort study.
Article in Infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo describe the epidemiology of blood cultures (BCs) drawn from patients with suspected sepsis by a rural ambulance service.
methodsPatients were included if they had clinically suspected sepsis and at least one BC was drawn. Variables associated with positive BCs were identified with logistic regression, culture results before and after ambulance antimicrobial therapy were compared and the susceptibility to empirical antimicrobial therapy in bacterial isolates was determined.
resultsAmong 392 included patients, sepsis severity score were higher when BCs were positive than negative, but there was no significant difference in 30-day all-cause mortality between BC negative and positive patients. In 47 patients ambulance blood cultures were positive (47/347 (13,5%)). Fever (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.11-2.15) was associated with higher odds of positive cultures, while lower respiratory tract infection was associated with lower odds of positive cultures (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.04-0.30). In 205 patients who had both ambulance and hospital BCs drawn and received ambulance antimicrobial therapy, only the ambulance BCs were positive in 16 patients, whereas in 4 patients only hospital cultures were positive. Bacterial isolates from positive BCs were susceptible to the empirical antimicrobial regimen in 80% of cases.
conclusionPositive ambulance BCs were associated with higher sepsis severity, and ambulance cultures were most useful in febrile patients with a suspected focus of infection other than the lower airways. Repeated BCs after hospital admission added only limited diagnostic value if an adequate ambulance BC had already been drawn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.