ArticleEJNMMI physics2026
A rapid total-body PET imaging approach for pediatric patients using non-attenuation-corrected PET scans.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPediatric lymphoma patients undergo multiple
methodsTwo hundred pediatric patients with FDG-avid lymphoma imaged on a total-body PET/CT scanner were retrospectively analyzed. From 10-min list-mode data, non-attenuation-corrected (NAC) PET images at 3-300 s were retrospectively reconstructed, and 600-s attenuation-corrected (AC) PET served as the reference. Whole-body coronal maximum-intensity projections (MIPs) were converted into 2D images and divided into 64 × 64 patches. For each acquisition duration, an independent latent diffusion-based autoencoder was trained to map the corresponding short-duration NAC PET MIPs to AC-like coronal PET MIPs. The intended clinical application was rapid pre-CT triage, with primary emphasis on the ultra-short 3-s setting, while longer durations were analyzed comparatively across count levels. Image quality was evaluated using PSNR, SSIM, and NMSE, as well as lesion ROI-based SUVmax and SUVmean. Three benchmark models (U-Net, GAN, and DDPM) were trained under identical settings for comparison. In addition, two nuclear medicine physicians assessed image quality using 5-point Likert scales, and lesion-level ROC and ALROC analyses were performed.
resultsSnapPET substantially improved image quality over NAC input for all acquisition times. For 3-s scans, PSNR increased from 28.6 ± 4.3 to 35.3 ± 6.0 and SSIM from 0.85 ± 0.09 to 0.98 ± 0.02, while NMSE decreased from 0.23 ± 0.18 to 0.03 ± 0.01 (all p < 0.001). SUV metrics in lesion ROIs showed high correlation with reference AC PET, with minimal bias. Compared with UNet, GAN, and DDPM, SnapPET achieved the best quantitative metrics and the highest lesion-level ROC and ALROC curves, indicating superior detectability and localization. Reader scores for noise suppression, artifact reduction, contrast retention, and lesion discrimination were consistently higher for SnapPET images, particularly for 3- and 15-s acquisitions.
conclusionSnapPET enables rapid pediatric PET imaging by generating high-quality, AC-like 2D images directly from ultra-short NAC acquisitions. The method improves image quality, preserves quantitative accuracy, and enhances lesion detectability compared with both NAC input and competing deep-learning baselines. This CT-sparing screening and triage approach has the potential to reduce reliance on attenuation-correction CT and support personalized, lower-dose CT strategies in pediatric lymphoma care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.