Trial reportEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2026
Understanding Pulmonary and Systemic Pharmacokinetics of Inhaled Fluticasone Propionate in Healthy Subjects Using Population PK Analysis.
Trial report in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesOne of the main hurdles in pulmonary drug delivery is the inability to directly quantify drug concentrations at the site of action within the lungs, which are critical for therapeutic efficacy. This research attempted to address this limitation by applying population pharmacokinetic modeling to characterize the pharmacokinetics of fluticasone propionate (FP), integrating multiple pulmonary absorption pathways and identifying key covariates that influence its pharmacokinetics.
methodsPlasma concentration-time data from 96 healthy volunteers participating in four pharmacokinetic (PK) studies using two FP formulations were analyzed, implementing non-linear mixed effects modeling to estimate population pharmacokinetic parameters, including lung deposition-related parameters. In all studies, 1000-µg doses of two FP formulations were administered via a metered-dose inhaler (MDI). A nonlinear mixed effects analysis with a maximum likelihood expectation maximization approach was applied using ADAPT 5 software.
resultsA three-compartment model with first-order distribution, elimination, and absorption processes described the FP pharmacokinetics. The final model considered three absorption peaks, in order of appearance in plasma, presumably in the central and peripheral parts of the lungs, with a delayed peak arising from outside the lung compartments. Weight was a predictor of the apparent clearance and volumes of distribution of FP. The final model suggested that approximately 17% of systemic exposure was associated with drug absorption from the central lung regions, while approximately 14% was associated with absorption from the peripheral lung regions. A secondary delayed peak was observed in the population PK analysis, with the remaining proportion of systemic exposure (~69%) modeled as arising outside the lung compartments. The precise origin of this delayed component remains uncertain, particularly given the extensive first-pass metabolism reported for fluticasone, and may reflect multiple overlapping processes, including redistribution or secondary pulmonary absorption.
conclusionThe proposed population PK model was able to characterize the PK of FP administered via inhalation and may be useful for better understanding the PK of other drug products administered through the inhalation route.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.