ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Multifrequency Electrical Impedance Myography Enhanced with Machine Learning for Screening Patients with Neuromuscular Disorders.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioimpedance: From Body Composition Assessment to Emerging Technologies in Clinical Nutrition.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Surface Electrical Impedance Myography in Assessment of Morphofunctional Changes in Biological Tissues and Biofeedback Interfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A review of soluble mediator and cytokine networks linking combination immunotherapy, tumor microenvironment remodeling and skeletal muscle dysfunction.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Emergent technologies in clinical neurophysiology to study the neuromuscular system: IFCN handbook chapter.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe evaluated surface electrical impedance myography (EIM) enhanced with machine learning to serve as a new office-based screening tool for neuromuscular disease
methodsEIM of nine muscles was successfully performed in 119 adults and 111 children (approximately half healthy and half diseased) for a total of 3158 individual muscle measurements. Multifrequency data were processed with feature engineering and classification. Nested cross-validation assessed performance, with muscle-based predictions aggregated to participant via majority voting
resultsSingle-feature analyses showed moderate-to-good discrimination (area-under-ROC curve of 0.62-0.73). When multifrequency features were used, participant-based logistic regression and extra trees ensemble models achieved 84% accuracy with 88.1% sensitivity in adults and 93% accuracy and 94.6% sensitivity in children. Beyond classification, regression using EIM predicted muscle strength with R
Indexed as
Identifiers
42171878What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.