Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42171867›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2026

Advances in Technology-Assisted Visual Rehabilitation Therapies: Scoping Review.

Mariana Saiz Briceño, Maria Paula Trujillo López, Laura Valentina Botia Suárez, Juan Camilo Tobo Hernández, Erwin Hernando Hernández Rincón

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mariana Saiz BriceñoPrimary Care Physician, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-4290-3440
Maria Paula Trujillo LópezPrimary Care Physician, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9316-2029
Laura Valentina Botia SuárezPrimary Care Physician, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0610-8946
Juan Camilo Tobo HernándezPrimary Care Physician, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2767-6954
Erwin Hernando Hernández RincónDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia. erwinhr@unisabana.edu.co.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7189-5863

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual impairment (VI) is a growing condition associated with aging, neurological diseases, and chronic eye conditions. In 2023, more than 2.2 billion people experienced VI, and at least 1 billion could have been prevented or remain untreated. Visual rehabilitation (VR) is essential for optimizing residual vision and promoting functional independence; however, only a minority have access to these services. In recent years, the development of technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), mobile applications, and virtual reality (VRt) has transformed VR, offering accessible and personalized alternatives. This scoping review aimed to map and categorize the available evidence on technology-assisted visual rehabilitation therapies, identifying the types of technologies used, their applications, and reported clinical and functional outcomes. A scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines to map the literature published between 2015 and 2025 on technology-assisted VR therapies in adults with VI worldwide. Twenty-five studies, mainly from developed countries, were included. Interventions included videoconferencing, computerized systems, portable devices, VRt, artificial vision (AV), and smart sensors. Overall, digital technologies were shown to improve visual function, autonomy, and quality of life, with high patient satisfaction and adherence. Telerehabilitation (TR), understood as the remote delivery of visual rehabilitation services through videoconferencing and digital monitoring platforms, has emerged as a viable and cost-effective strategy. In contrast, immersive virtual reality technologies (VRt), head-mounted display systems, and multisensory integration devices have demonstrated potential to stimulate neuroplasticity and enhance functional visual outcomes.Telerehabilitation platforms, immersive virtual reality systems, portable electronic vision enhancement devices, artificial vision technologies, and sensor-based monitoring tools are emerging as promising interventions. These technologies have demonstrated improvements in visual acuity, reading performance, visual field sensitivity, patient adherence, and functional autonomy, although most studies remain small-scale and geographically concentrated in high-income settings.

Indexed as

Vision DisordersArtificial IntelligenceDigital HealthHumansQuality of LifeTelemedicineTelerehabilitationVirtual RealityArtificial IntelligenceTechnologyTelerehabilitationVisual ImpairmentVisual Rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42171867
PMCPMC13197244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.