ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2026
External validation of predictive models for prolonged postoperative ileus following colorectal resection.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionProlonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) is a frequent complication after colorectal surgery. Several prediction models have been proposed to estimate PPOI risk, but few have undergone external validation, limiting their generalizability and clinical usefulness. The primary aim of this study was to externally validate two predictive models for PPOI after colorectal resection; a secondary aim was to explore factors associated with PPOI in our cohort.
methodsData from all consecutive patients who underwent elective colorectal resection in our department between 2019 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed from a prospective database. Eligible criteria were age ≥ 18 years, elective colorectal resection, and ASA score I-III. Based on a recent systematic review, we selected the models by Hain et al. and Wolthuis et al. for external validation, as all required variables were available in our dataset. Model performance was assessed in terms of discrimination, calibration, and overall accuracy. An exploratory multivariable regression analysis was also performed to assess factors associated with PPOI.
resultsAmong 200 patients undergoing colorectal resection, 43 (21.5%) developed PPOI. Both prediction models showed poor external performance. The Hain model had a C-statistic of 0.597 (95% CI 0.514-0.681) and the Wolthuis model a C-statistic of 0.589 (95% CI 0.501-0.677), with suboptimal calibration and limited overall accuracy. In secondary exploratory multivariable analyses, postoperative opioid use was associated with PPOI in both models. In the model excluding postoperative oral intake initiation and autonomous postoperative mobilization, splenic flexure mobilization was associated with lower odds of PPOI; in the fully adjusted model, delayed postoperative oral intake initiation was associated with PPOI. These exploratory local findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating.
conclusionsExternal validation of two previously published PPOI prediction models demonstrated poor performance in this cohort, limiting their transportability to our setting. The secondary exploratory analysis identified potentially relevant postoperative factors, but these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating. Further research should prioritize harmonized PPOI definitions and robust multicentre validation of prediction models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.