Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42171718›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026

Prevalence and Temporal Trends of Female Genital Cutting Among Women in Sierra Leone.

Marie Bangura, Christopher X Hong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marie BanguraDivision of Gynecology, Beth Israel Lahey Hospital, 67 S. Bedford Street, Suite 300 West, Burlington, MA, USA. bangura.mariej@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6240-0822
Christopher X HongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisFemale genital cutting (FGC) remains prevalent in Sierra Leone, yet conventional cross-sectional analyses limit understanding of age-specific risk and long-term temporal trends. We aimed to estimate age-specific prevalence of FGC from 1984 to 2019 and to compare prevalence levels and trends before and after 2013 across selected age cohorts.

methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from the 2019 Sierra Leone Demographic and Health Survey, which included women aged 15-49 years. Participants reported FGC status and age at which FGC occurred. Using respondent age at survey and reported age at FGC, we reconstructed calendar-year-specific prevalence estimates for women aged 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 years from 1984 to 2019. Weighted prevalence before (1984-2013) and after 2013 (2014-2019) was compared, and temporal trends were assessed using survey-weighted linear regression.

resultsAmong 14,644 respondents, the weighted prevalence of FGC was 87.3%. The median age at FGC was 12 years (interquartile range 9-15). Weighted prevalence was highest among women aged 35 years (94.2%) and lowest among those aged 15 years (72.2%), with a marked increase between ages 15 and 20. Significant declines in prevalence were observed across all age groups between the pre- and post-2013 periods, with the largest absolute reduction among 15-year-olds (-15.9%). However, no age group demonstrated a statistically significant change in the rate of decline after 2013.

conclusionsPrevalence of FGC in Sierra Leone has declined over time, particularly among younger cohorts, but remains high. Late adolescence and early adulthood represent a critical period of ongoing risk.

Indexed as

Circumcision, FemaleAdolescentAdultAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMiddle AgedPrevalenceSierra LeoneYoung AdultFemale genital cuttingFemale genital mutilationPrevalenceSierra Leone

Identifiers

PMID42171718
PMCPMC13486006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.