ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Nasal Aesthetic Restoration by Pre-expanded Paramedian Forehead Flap with Autologous Cartilage Framework and Laser Treatment.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs a prominent feature of the face, the nose is susceptible to a variety of traumatic or pathological defects. It is a challenge to restore the external nasal structures because of its delicate three-dimensional contours. For the defects involved in multiple subunits, the restoration procedures are difficult because of the requirements of sufficient skin cover, steady cartilage supporting and lining. In this study, the authors applied pre-expanded paramedian forehead flap combined with autologous cartilage framework and laser treatment to rebuild nasal structures and aesthetics.
methodA retrospective analysis was performed on nine patients who underwent nasal reconstructions and followed up between January 2020 and July 2024. The clinical data and surgical procedures were recorded and analyzed. The staged surgeries were included: tissue expander implantation, nasal reconstruction and pedicle division. The laser hair removal was applied postoperatively. The aesthetic outcomes were evaluated by FACE-Q questionnaires. The scars were scored by Vancouver Scar Scale.
resultsA total of 9 patients (3 females and 6 males) were included, with a mean age of 28.33 ± 7.30 years. Seven flaps survived well without complication. Partial necrosis at the distal end of flap occurred in one case, and another case developed a postoperative wound infection. The scar quality was scored 2.78 ± 1.02 and 2.56 ± 0.88 in the donor and recipient sites by the Vancouver Scar Scale. The nasal appearance outcomes were scored 82.22 ± 6.65 by the Satisfaction With Nose Scale and 76.33 ± 11.30 by the Satisfaction With Nostrils. The donor sites of the forehead were scored 83.56 ± 5.46 by the Satisfaction With Forehead and Eyebrows.
conclusionsThe pre-expanded forehead flap combining with autologous cartilage is a feasible method for nasal reconstruction. The expansion technique and autologous costicartilage could provide adequate skin cover and reliable supporting to complete the nasal reconstruction with good outcomes. Postoperative laser and anti-scar treatments are beneficial for the appearance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42171696What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.