Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42171671›Full record

ReviewJournal of endocrinological investigation2026

Cyclic Cushing syndrome as a clinical enigma and diagnostic dilemma in advanced endocrinology.

Yeva Ilkiv, Kateryna Potapova, Viktoriia Yerokhovych, Nazarii Kobyliak

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yeva IlkivBogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine. evailkiv333@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3849-3289
Kateryna PotapovaBogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6005-5087
Viktoriia YerokhovychBogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9800-9796
Nazarii KobyliakBogomolets National Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9814-689X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cyclic Cushing's syndrome (CCS), a rare and atypical form of endogenous hypercortisolism, remains a very relevant problem from a diagnostic point of view. To confirm this disease, it is necessary to record two episodes of hypercortisolism alternating with period of normocortisolism. Intercyclic phase is characterized not only by negative laboratory test results but also by the absence of pronounced symptoms, making the pathology hidden and, presumably, undiagnosed in certain cases. Some causes remain undetermined and require further investigation. The process of diagnosing and verifying CCS is often lengthy and requires repeated testing at certain intervals. However, none of the currently available methods are 100% accurate. Therefore, a step-by-step approach with confirmation by several highly sensitive tests is recommended for the differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent and ACTH-independent cyclic hypercortisolism. The risk of false results cannot be ruled out even when the most reliable methods available today are used. Thus, the diagnostic algorithm for each individual case will be specific and will depend on the phase of the disease, the patient's condition, and concomitant pathology. Our review summarizes current data on the mechanisms of cyclic hypercortisolism known to date and provides a comparative and critical analysis of modern diagnostic methods that help identify this pathology and indicate its origin.

Indexed as

Cushing SyndromeEndocrinologyAdrenocorticotropic HormoneDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansAdrenocorticotropic HormoneAdrenocorticotropic hormoneCortisolCyclic Cushing's syndromeHypercortisolism

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.