ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
SurgViVQA: temporally grounded video question answering for surgical scene understanding.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeVideo question answering (VideoQA) in the surgical domain aims to enhance intraoperative understanding by enabling AI models to reason over temporally coherent events rather than isolated frames. Current approaches are limited to static image features, and available datasets often lack temporal annotations, ignoring the dynamics critical for accurate procedural interpretation.
methodsWe propose SurgViVQA, a surgical VideoQA model that extends visual reasoning from static images to dynamic surgical scenes. It uses a Masked Video-Text Encoder to fuse video and question features, capturing temporal cues like motion and tool-tissue interactions, which a fine-tuned LLM then decodes into coherent answers. To evaluate its performance, we curate REAL-Colon-VQA, a colonoscopic video dataset including motion questions and diagnostic attributes, including out-of-template questions with rephrased or semantically altered formulations to evaluate model robustness.
resultsExperimental validation on REAL-Colon-VQA and the public EndoVis18-VQA dataset shows that SurgViVQA outperforms existing image-based VQA benchmark models and remains competitive with a fine-tuned video VLM baseline. In particular, SurgViVQA improves over PitVQA by +9% on REAL-Colon-VQA and +9% on EndoVis18-VQA in Keyword Accuracy, while achieving the strongest overall lexical and semantic generation performance. A perturbation study on the questions further confirms improved generalizability and robustness to variations in question phrasing.
conclusionSurgViVQA and the REAL-Colon-VQA dataset provide a framework for temporally aware understanding in surgical VideoQA, enabling AI models to interpret dynamic procedural contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.