ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Clinical feasibility study of generative depth estimation to diagnose airway stenosis using 3D slicer.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAirway Stenosis (AS) refers to the obstruction observed in the expiration phase of breathing. Bronchoscopy is a minimally invasive procedure for diagnosing and treating AS. Physicians assess the severity of the obstruction using the stenosis index (SI). However, the prevailing method for estimating SI is subjective and has been found to need more precision. APPROACH: This study aimed to develop a generative depth estimation integrated into a 3D Slicer to assist clinicians in determining the stenosis index from CT and bronchoscopic images. We compared the efficacy of this video-based SI estimation to the CT-based method, using subjective human-based bronchoscopic assessments as a reference standard. We integrated the earlier conceptualized generative depth estimation technique into a 3D Slicer module, making it publicly accessible. An interim clinical analysis was conducted, juxtaposing the SI quantification performance of an expert bronchoscopist in the operating room (human-based) with the video-based and CT-based estimates provided by our new tool on 30 patient datasets assessed by three other expert bronchoscopists.
resultsThe correlation coefficient between the human-based SI estimation and CT-based assessment was 0.58 (
conclusionsOur study introduces a public tool that employs depth estimation to evaluate AS observed in bronchoscopy. When comparing our method to human subjective assessments and CT-based evaluations, the results underscore the potential of our video-based AS quantification tool in aiding physicians during bronchoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42171651What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.