ArticleJCI insight2026
Distinct immune landscapes characterize highly versus minimally invasive brain metastases.
Article in JCI insight, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain metastases (BrMs) occur in approximately 30% of cancer patients, causing nearly one-fifth of cancer deaths. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) benefit some BrM patients, responses remain highly variable. This variability partly reflects distinct histopathological growth patterns that include minimally invasive (MI) and highly invasive (HI) brain BrMs. Here we show that MI BrMs exhibit robust immune infiltration, whereas HI lesions are immunosuppressed. However, histological differentiation between MI and HI can be challenging because of subjective margin assessment. Here, using highly multiplexed spatial proteomics on 119 tumor sections from 46 patients with BrMs, we identify CHI3L1 as a key mediator of the immunosuppressive microenvironment in HI BrMs. In preclinical models, genetic deletion of CHI3L1 converts immune-cold metastases into lymphocyte-rich, ICI-responsive lesions infiltrated by granzyme B+ CD8+ T cells. In BrM patients treated with ICI, immunohistochemical quantification of CHI3L1 expression was a stronger predictor of ICI response than traditional MI/HI classification. Thus, CHI3L1 represents a promising biomarker and therapeutic target for BrMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.