ArticleJACC. Asia2026
Postprocedural Anticoagulation After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: 1-Year Results From the RIGHT Trial and Meta-analyses.
Article in JACC. Asia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03664180 (Randomized Comparison of Anticoagulation After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Enoxaparin, ACT Guided Unfractionated Heparin or Bivalirudin Prolongation vs. no Anticoagulation To Improve Clinical Outcome), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Comparison of Anticoagulation After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Enoxaparin, ACT Guided Unfractionated Heparin or Bivalirudin Prolongation vs. no Anticoagulation To Improve Clinical Outcome
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Revisiting Postprocedural Anticoagulation After Primary PCI: Lessons From the RIGHT Trial.JACC. Asia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe RIGHT trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of postprocedural anticoagulation (PPA) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
objectivesThe authors aimed to report the prespecified 1-year outcomes.
methodsRIGHT is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority trial conducted in 53 sites across China. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were randomly assigned (1:1) after primary PCI to receive low-dose PPA (enoxaparin, unfractionated heparin, or bivalirudin) or matching placebo for at least 48 hours. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) including all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, stent thrombosis (definite), and urgent revascularization (any vessel), were assessed during a 1-year follow-up.
resultsOver a median follow-up of 1.0 year (IQR: 1.0-1.0), MACE data were available for 99.2% of participants. MACEs occurred in 4.2% (63/1,494) of the PPA group and 4.9% (73/1,495) of the placebo group (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.61-1.21), with no between-group difference in major bleeding (1.3% vs 1.5%; HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.47-1.62). In the group of enoxaparin vs placebo, we observed reduction of MACEs with enoxaparin (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.30-0.97) with no excess bleeding. Meta-analyses also showed an advantage of enoxaparin over no anticoagulation in reducing MACEs at 30 days (risk ratio: 0.635; 95% CI: 0.399-0.997).
conclusionsLow-dose PPA after primary PCI was safe but did not reduce ischemic events at the 1-year follow-up. If clinically indicated, our results suggest that enoxaparin may be beneficial and warrants confirmation in future studies. (Comparison of Anticoagulation Prolongation vs. no Anticoagulation in STEMI Patients After Primary PCI [RIGHT]; NCT03664180).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.