ArticleThe Journal of general physiology2026
Long-term inactivation mediated by different FGF-A homologues on heterologously expressed NaV1.2 currents.
Article in The Journal of general physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A-isoforms of cytosolic growth factor homologous factors (FGF11-14) mediate long-term inactivation (LTI) of voltage-dependent sodium (NaV) channels. LTI is a rapid onset process that is competitive with the fast inactivation (IF) intrinsic to NaV channels, with little or no interconversion between inactivated states. Since recovery from LTI is orders of magnitude slower than recovery from IF, repetitive depolarizations lead to use-dependent accumulation of NaV channels in slow recovery states, thereby limiting NaV availability during trains of action potentials. Of the two or more N-terminal splice variants of the various FGF homologues, LTI specifically arises only from the A-isoform of each FGF subunit. Although there is substantial homology among the N termini of the four FGF-A paralogs, to what extent LTI generated by the different FGF-A homologues may differ has not been directly addressed. Here, using heterologous expression in HEK293T cells, we evaluate the kinetics of onset and recovery from LTI mediated by hFGF11-14A in association with WT hNaV1.2. We also use NaV channels with fast inactivation removed (IQM) to measure rates of LTI-mediated inactivation and recovery in the absence of intrinsic fast inactivation. Among the four FGF-A homologues, we identify two features that can differ. First, different FGF-A's differ in the rate of onset into LTI. Second, the rate of recovery from inactivation, whether measured with WT NaV1.2 or with NaV1.2_IQM, differs among FGF-A's. The functional differences among FGF-A homologues differentially sculpt the time course and extent of use-dependent accumulation of NaV1.2 channels into LTI. This, in turn, would differentially impact on NaV availability during repetitive firing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.