ArticleClinical and translational science2026
Highlighting Rigor, Reproducibility, and Transparency of Research in an Academic CV.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In academia, the curriculum vitae (CV) is the central document used for hiring, promotion, or tenure applications. The content and format of these CVs and accompanying documents varies among institutions and is a direct reflection of the institution's values. Few institutions consider rigor, reproducibility, or transparency practices for hiring, promotion, or tenure decisions. We developed a new CV template for Stanford's School of Medicine for researchers to highlight their use of those practices, making it possible to evaluate faculty not just on research reports, but how they do the research itself. The new additions include listing (and linking) availability of protocols, analysis plans, analytic code, data, public accessibility of results for research outputs; registration number and result reporting for clinical trials; details of peer review activities; and candidate's persistent identifier (e.g., ORCID iD). We also include a variety of practices supporting research rigor and reproducibility that can be described in a candidate's narrative statement. For those who dedicate time and resources to maximize the rigor, reproducibility, and transparency of their work, our new CV template makes these efforts visible, a precondition for valuing them. This can serve as a model for other institutions, while future advances in scholarly metadata and systems could facilitate easier collection and reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.