ArticleRadiology. Imaging cancer2026
Transcatheter CT Hepatic Arteriography versus Conventional CT Guidance for Percutaneous Microwave Ablation of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumors.
Article in Radiology. Imaging cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter CT hepatic arteriography (angio-CT)-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (AA) for small hepatocellular carcinoma tumors and compare its outcomes with those of conventional CT-guided microwave ablation (CA). Materials and Methods The authors performed a retrospective review of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma tumors less than 3 cm in size treated with AA and CA from June 2019 to August 2024 at a single institution. Hepatic arteriography was performed after transarterial catheterization in an angio-CT hybrid suite. CA was performed with or without US. The authors evaluated the target-lesion radiologic response according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria at follow-up contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. Target-lesion progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression hazard models were used to identify variables associated with PFS. Adverse events were retrospectively reviewed. Results A total of 70 patients and 85 tumors were included in this study (mean age, 63.2 years ± 9.5 [SD]; 49 male patients). Thirty-six tumors (27 patients) were treated with AA. Forty-nine tumors (43 patients) were treated with CA. The 3-month complete response rate (100% vs 79.6%;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.