Observational studyInternational wound journal2026
Absence of Bacterial Fluorescence Is Associated With Early Response to Skin Substitutes in Diabetic and Venous Ulcers: A Single-Blinded Prospective Study.
Observational study in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cellular, acellular or matrix-like products (CAMPs), also referred to as 'skin substitutes', are applied to chronic wounds to help expedite healing when standard therapies fail. However, their efficacy is compromised by infection, and possibly high bacterial loads, as suggested in prior literature. This prospective observational pilot study explored the association between bacterial burden and early healing outcomes in chronic diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers following skin substitute application. Bacterial fluorescence imaging was performed immediately prior to skin substitute placement to identify areas of high bacterial load (positive fluorescence), with wound area reduction tracked at 4 ± 1 weeks postapplication. Of the 10 patients analysed, the primary endpoint of achieving 40% wound area reduction was met by 4/5 of baseline fluorescence negative wounds, compared to 0/5 baseline fluorescence positive wounds (p < 0.05). The baseline fluorescence negative group showed a 68.0% wound area reduction, in contrast to the baseline fluorescence positive group, which showed a 33.7% increase in wound area (p < 0.05). Taken together with existing evidence, these findings suggest that elevated bacterial load during CAMP application significantly impedes early wound healing. Bacterial fluorescence imaging is an effective tool to optimise wound bed preparation and identify the best candidate for skin substitute application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.