ArticleIntegrative zoology2026
Congener Dreissenid Mussels Differ in Their Survival and Behavioral Responses to Drought and Immersion in Sediments.
Article in Integrative zoology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quagga (QM) and zebra (ZM) mussels (Dreissena bugensis and Dreissena polymorpha) are invasive bivalves forming freshwater fouling communities of high economic and environmental importance in Europe and North America. They may experience immersion in soft sediments by sedimenting particles (mostly at deeper locations or areas with high hydrodynamic activity) or while attached to burrowing unionid mussels. On the other hand, mussels located near the water surface may encounter water level decreases and air exposure during droughts. We experimentally tested mussel survival and behavioral responses to immersion in sediments and water level reduction. Interspecific differences in these responses can help understand the ongoing replacement of ZM by QM in invaded communities and less common cases of their co-existence. ZM were more resistant to both stressors, surviving longer when immersed in sediments or exposed to air. Moreover, both species survived better in coarse versus fine sediments. QM re-emerged from sediments more efficiently than ZM. In turn, ZM relocated over longer downward distances facing water level reduction compared to the behavior of individuals tested at the constant water level. Thus, ZM seem better adapted to remain at their attachment sites, survive temporary adverse conditions, and cope with dangers typical for shallow nearshore areas. On the other hand, QM perform better on soft bottoms, abandoning their attachment sites to cope with immersion in sediments. These adaptations allow QM to dominate deep-water soft sediments, whereas ZM can find refuges in areas periodically exposed to air and on unionid mussels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.