Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42171123›Full record

ArticleJournal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine2026

Independent and Incremental Value of Breast Mass Orientation Angle in Ultrasound-Based Malignancy Prediction.

Nungky Kusumaningtyas, Vera Nevyta Tarigan, Nina Ish Supit, Fajar Lamhot Gultom, Evan Nugroho, Malvin Chandra, Edwin Sanjaya, Callistus Bruce Henfry Sulay, Gilbert Sterling Octavius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nungky KusumaningtyasWoman Imaging Division, Department of Radiology, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang, Indonesia.
Vera Nevyta TariganWoman Imaging Division, Department of Radiology, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang, Indonesia.
Nina Ish SupitWoman Imaging Division, Department of Radiology, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang, Indonesia.
Fajar Lamhot GultomAnatomical Pathology, Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Evan NugrohoRadiology Resident, Faculty of Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang, Indonesia.
Malvin ChandraRadiology Resident, Faculty of Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang, Indonesia.
Edwin SanjayaRadiology Resident, Faculty of Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang, Indonesia.
Callistus Bruce Henfry SulayRadiology Resident, Faculty of Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang, Indonesia.
Gilbert Sterling OctaviusRadiology Resident, Faculty of Universitas Pelita Harapan, Tangerang, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6439-6265

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOrientation of breast masses on ultrasonography is a well-recognized feature for differentiating benign from malignant lesions. Recent studies suggest that quantitative assessment of the orientation angle may improve diagnostic discrimination. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the orientation angle in a real-world cohort and to determine its incremental value when integrated with established clinical and sonographic predictors.

methodsThis retrospective study included 502 biopsy-proven breast lesions evaluated with ultrasound between 2019 and 2025. The orientation angle was defined as the acute angle between the longest axis of the lesion and the skin surface measured on transverse images. Inter-reader reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed with and without the orientation angle to assess independent predictors of malignancy and incremental model performance.

resultsOf the 502 lesions, 258 (51.4%) were malignant. Measurement reliability was excellent, with ICC values exceeding 0.96. Malignant lesions demonstrated significantly larger orientation angles than benign lesions and showed a stepwise increase across Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System categories. An optimal cut-off value of 25.3° yielded an AUC of 0.72, specificity of 90.2%, and a positive likelihood ratio of 4.66. In multivariable analysis, orientation angle remained independently associated with malignancy (odds ratio 1.03 per degree increase; p < .001).

conclusionQuantitative orientation angle is a reproducible and independent predictor of breast malignancy and provides incremental diagnostic value beyond conventional ultrasound descriptors, supporting its role as a complementary imaging biomarker in breast ultrasound assessment.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsUltrasonography, MammaryAdultAgedBreastDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and Specificitybreast cancerbreast imaging reporting and data systemorientation angleultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID42171123
PMCPMC13578522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.