ReviewThe Biochemical journal2026
Computational modelling of cell identity.
Review in The Biochemical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deciphering cell identity remains a central challenge in biology, as experimental profiling can only capture a fraction of the molecular diversity across human cell states. Computational modelling fills this gap by offering scalable predictions beyond what experimental assays can measure. These models play key roles in classifying cell type, discovering previously unknown states, interpreting perturbation responses, and generating hypotheses for contexts that are experimentally inaccessible. The rapid expansion of consortium-level data has enabled models to learn generalisable genomic features of cell identity. In the present review, we examine 43 representative computational methods utilising information extracted from genomic regulatory elements, marker genes, or reference atlases and traditional machine learning or transformer-based approaches for cell identity inference. By outlining biological rationales, applications, and limitations of these methods in a minimally technical tone, the review serves as a practical guide for biologists to choose appropriate methods for their specific analytical needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.