ReviewKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2026
Navicular and fifth metatarsal base stress fractures: An illustrated anatomical review.
Review in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial commentary: Anatomical insights, diagnostic challenges and evolving treatment strategies for midfoot sporting injuries in elite athletes.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The navicular bone and the proximal fifth metatarsal (M5) play a vital role in maintaining the structural integrity and biomechanical stability of the foot's medial and lateral columns, respectively. Both bones' unique anatomical configuration, intricate mechanical environment and limited vascular supply make specific locations particularly vulnerable to stress fractures. Moreover, the combination of mechanical loading patterns and restricted perfusion in the navicular and proximal M5 further contributes to delayed healing, nonunion and refracture. Therefore, finding suitable treatment options for the different damage patterns involving both bones is critical for reducing complications and improving clinical results. This paper aims to clarify the anatomical and biomechanical features underlying these fractures to improve diagnosis, prevention, and clinical management in high-risk populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.