ArticleHealth promotion international2026
'We gout your back': a qualitative study to co-design educational gout resources with Pacific people in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Article in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pacific peoples in Aotearoa New Zealand experience some of the highest rates of gout worldwide. Although understanding gout and urate-lowering therapy is a key component of ensuring uptake and adherence to medication, Pacific communities have identified a lack of resources and tools to support this. The objective of this qualitative study was to co-design education resources for Pacific patients and communities in Aotearoa New Zealand, aiming to increase awareness of gout and of urate-lowering therapy. A Pacific Research Collective, comprising Pacific community members, health professionals, and researchers, led this study. Guided by the Samoan Fa'afaletui model, six co-design workshops were undertaken using semistructured talanga (interactive talk with a purpose), and this paper presents the results from the latter three workshops. Participants included Pacific community members and health professionals aged 20-75 years and included Samoan, Tongan, Cook Islands Māori, and Niuean ethnicities. Participants reviewed existing gout resources, developed prototypes, and provided iterative feedback. Data was collated in NVIVO, and reflexive thematic analysis was used to inductively develop five key themes: (i) a disconnect between existing gout resources and community needs, (ii) Pacific-centred approaches to improve understanding of gout, (iii) benefits of video resources, (iv) recognizing diverse Pacific audiences, and (v) reflections on final co-designed resources. This co-design process prioritized Pacific views and lived experiences to develop culturally grounded gout education resources that can be utilized in healthcare settings and community outreach programmes. Future research should continue to partner with communities to ensure education approaches are relevant, appropriate, and impactful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.