Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42170953›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Involuntary feedback responses reflect a representation of partner actions.

Seth R Sullivan, John H Buggeln, Jan A Calalo, Truc T Ngo, Jennifer A Semrau, Michael J Carter, Joshua G A Cashaback

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Seth R SullivanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0840-8292
John H BuggelnDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4276-8806
Jan A CalaloDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, United States.
Truc T NgoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, United States.
Jennifer A SemrauDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, United States.
Michael J CarterDepartment of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0675-4271
Joshua G A CashabackDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8642-6648

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2018- 05589U.S. National Science Foundation 2146888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have a remarkable ability to seamlessly and rapidly coordinate actions with others, from double Dutch to dancing. Humans use high-level partner representations to jointly control voluntary actions, while other work shows lower-level involuntary feedback responses to sudden visual perturbations. Yet, it is unknown if a high-level partner representation can be rapidly expressed through lower-level involuntary sensorimotor circuitry. Here, we test the idea that a partner representation influences involuntary visuomotor feedback responses during a cooperative sensorimotor task. Using two experiments and dynamic game theory predictions, we show that involuntary visuomotor feedback responses reflect a partner representation and consideration of a partner's movement cost (i.e., accuracy and energy). Collectively, our results suggest there is top-down modulation from high-level partner representations to lower-level sensorimotor circuits, enabling fast and flexible feedback responses during jointly coordinated actions.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorFeedback, SensoryPsychomotor PerformanceAdultFemaleGame TheoryHumansMaleYoung Adultgame theoryhumanhuman-humanjoint actionmotor controlneuroscienceoptimal controlsensorimotor

Identifiers

PMID42170953
PMCPMC13197164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.