ArticleChina CDC weekly2026
Comparative Epidemiology and Transmission Risk Assessment of Imported and Indigenous Dengue Fever at the National and Selected Provincial Levels, China, 2005-2025.
Article in China CDC weekly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study compared epidemiological characteristics of imported and indigenous dengue fever cases in China from 2005 to 2025 and assessed the dynamic provincial transmission risks. Methods: This study compared the 21-year trends in national surveillance data. It examined temporal changes in the countries of origin of imported cases and the dynamic risk ratio of indigenous to imported cases across ten high-import provinces, as well as the disparity of epidemiological characteristics between imported and indigenous cases. Results: Indigenous cases dominated the epidemic in China (90.1%, 134,129/148,893). Imported cases (9.9%, 14,764/148,893) were the initial trigger, increasing notably before the local epidemic season. They were predominantly men (70.5%) aged 25-49 years, mainly "farmers and workers (38.6%)" and "commercial/service personnel (22.9%)". In contrast, indigenous cases had a balanced sex ratio (1.1:1), and "household/unemployed/retired persons (32.1%)" constituted the largest occupational group. Further spatiotemporal analysis revealed that: 1) The primary source country for imported cases nationwide shifted from Cambodia (41.1%) to Myanmar (29.6%); 2) Imported cases in Yunnan were predominantly from Myanmar (71.1%) and "farmers and workers (50.5%)", whereas in Guangdong, they were more diverse in origin and dominated by "commercial/service personnel (30.2%)"; 3) The risk ratio of indigenous to imported cases across ten provinces exhibited significant heterogeneity: Yunnan and Guangdong were persistent high-risk areas, whereas Sichuan and Jiangsu maintained lower risk. Hunan and Chongqing exhibited high-risk in recent years, with Chongqing's ratio reaching 36.5 in 2025 and Hunan's 15.5 in 2024. Conclusions: The dengue fever epidemic in China was initiated by importation; however, the scale and risk of subsequent local transmission varied significantly and dynamically across provinces. Control strategies should integrate source interception of imported cases with tailored interventions addressing distinct importation profiles, evolving local transmission risks, and population characteristics across provinces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.