ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2026
Mixed reality-guided intraoperative visual support for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a mixed reality-guided intraoperative visual support system for safe and accurate needle applicator insertion for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy (IC/IS-BT). Materials and Methods: A QR code was printed as a position and scale alignment reference when merging the real and virtual worlds. The QR code was positioned near the RANDO phantom, and MRI and CT scanning were performed. Treatment planning data, including the target and organs at risk structures and dose distribution from a cervical cancer patient who underwent brachytherapy, were attached to MRI and CT images of the RANDO phantom using a radiation treatment planning system and stored as DICOM data. DICOM data were then converted to object files (OBJ) that represent 3D shapes. These OBJ files were imported into the computer-generated virtual world, and the mixed reality application was built and executed on head-mounted displays (HMDs). Results: The system successfully merged the real and virtual worlds through the HMD, displaying 3D support data on the phantom. This system allows all HMD wearers to share 3D support data. Positions and scales between the real and virtual worlds are aligned using the upper left-hand corner of the QR code as the reference point, and the worlds are merged. Phantom-based evaluations demonstrated that projection errors measured by Operator A were 3.1 ± 1.1 mm in the anterior-posterior (A-P) direction and 2.6 ± 1.1 mm in the right-left (R-L) direction; corresponding projection errors for Operator B were 2.1 ± 1.4 mm in the A-P direction and 2.4 ± 1.1 mm in the R-L direction (n = 10 measurements per operator). The average frame rate was 69.7 ± 11.5 fps, corresponding to a latency of 14 msec. Conclusions: This report presents the system configuration, accuracy assessment and potential clinical applications for IC/IS-BT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.