ArticleCommunications earth & environment2026
Enhanced organic carbon burial in rewetted wetlands precedes long-term stabilization.
Article in Communications earth & environment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rewetting drained wetlands restores long-term carbon storage by reviving organic carbon burial in sediments and rebuilding carbon stocks, but the decades-long recovery pathway is uncertain. Sediment cores were dated using naturally occurring radioactive lead-210, verified with cesium-137 from past nuclear testing, to reconstruct organic carbon burial rates before drainage and for 4-40 years after rewetting across two restoration chronosequences in dry and wet climate zones; undisturbed wetlands provided benchmarks. Burial rates in undisturbed wetlands (median: 0.60 Mg C ha
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.