ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Victim-centered justice through profiling: clustering analysis of parent who suffered abuse.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding victimization in the context of parent abuse requires a comprehensive approach that considers the complex interplay of demographic, situational, and psychological factors. This study examines 3,834 administrative records from a victim support system, corresponding to 782 unique cases of parents who suffered violence, to identify distinct victim typologies and inform more effective, victim-centered interventions within the legal system. Drawing on variables such as age, gender, marital status, socioeconomic background, and harm types (physical, psychological, economic, and social), the dataset was analyzed using K-means clustering to uncover latent patterns. A two-cluster solution was selected based on statistical validation, offering both interpretability and strong group separation. Cluster 0, comprising 26.3% of the sample, was characterized by a slightly older average age (mean = 61.3 years) and exhibited a diverse set of vulnerability factors not primarily defined by psychological harm resulting from criminal acts. Members of this cluster showed elevated rates of widowhood (28.6% compared to 17.7% in Cluster 1), suggesting potentially different social support needs. In contrast, Cluster 1, labeled Psychological-Impact Victims, constituted the majority of the sample (73.7%), defined by the presence of psychological harm following criminal incidents, with a lower average age (mean = 58.0 years) and higher rates of separation or divorce (26.9% vs. 19.4%). This binary classification reveals a meaningful distinction in victim experiences of parent who suffered violence. Cluster 0 requires broad social support, while Cluster 1 needs trauma-informed psychological care. These findings emphasize the importance of tailored interventions over uniform approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.