ArticleJournal of pain research2026
Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Therapy Using Single High-Dose S-Ketamine Infusion for Fibromyalgia: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label, Blinded-Endpoint Study Protocol.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07230171 (Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Conventional Therapy With Conventional Therapy Combined Esketamine in the Treatment of Fibromyalgia), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Conventional Therapy With Conventional Therapy Combined Esketamine in the Treatment of Fibromyalgia: A Multicenter Clinical Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic pain syndrome with limited response and delayed onset to current treatments. Esketamine (ESK) shows potential as a rapid-acting analgesic in FM patients, but previous low-dose studies have had limited efficacy and are constrained by single-center designs, monotherapy approaches, and small sample sizes. The efficacy of higher-dose ESK administered as an adjunct to guideline-recommended pharmacotherapy in FM remains unclear. Study Design: Multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial. Methods and Analysis: A total of 92 adult FM patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the treatment group (single intravenous infusion of ESK plus oral pregabalin and venlafaxine) or the control group (oral pregabalin and venlafaxine alone). In the treatment group, ESK will be administered as a single intravenous infusion at a dose of 1 mg/kg on the day of enrollment. Both groups will follow identical dose titration regimens for pregabalin and venlafaxine, with dose escalation individualized according to patient tolerability and clinical response. Plasma concentrations of ESK and its metabolites will be measured at the end of infusion to enable a limited characterization of systemic exposure and to support exploratory exposure-response analyses. Participants will be followed for 12 weeks. The primary outcome is the change from baseline in the mean pain intensity during the first week after treatment. The secondary outcomes include average pain intensity, worst pain intensity, and proportion of patients achieving ≥50% and ≥30% pain reduction, median pain relief time, maximal tolerated doses of pregabalin and venlafaxine, patient-reported outcomes (Revised FM Impact Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Short Form 36 Health survey, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, and Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale), plasma concentrations of ESK and its metabolites at the end of infusion, and adverse events throughout the study period. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrails.gov identifier: NCT07230171. Registered on November 13, 2025 (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/search?term=NCT07230171).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.