ReviewTranslational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer2026
Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer management: current applications, limitations, and future directions.
Review in Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Abbreviated MRI Protocols in Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a cornerstone of breast cancer management, demonstrating superior sensitivity compared to mammography and ultrasound, particularly for high-risk screening and the evaluation of dense breast tissue. Beyond detection, MRI provides critical physiologic and anatomical assessment essential for accurate staging, visualizing invasive lobular carcinoma, and identifying multifocal or multicentric disease. It also plays a vital role in monitoring therapeutic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by distinguishing between concentric tumor shrinkage and fragmentation, a distinction that directly influences surgical eligibility. Despite these diagnostic advantages, the indications for preoperative MRI remain controversial. This review examines the tension between MRI's utility in surgical planning-specifically its association with reduced positive margins and lower re-excision rates-and concerns regarding overdiagnosis, increased mastectomy rates, and false-positive findings. Logistical barriers to widespread adoption, including cost-effectiveness, gadolinium concerns, and the need for standardized interpretation protocols, are also discussed. Finally, the article highlights transformative advancements designed to address these limitations. Technologies such as abbreviated (AB-MRI) and ultrafast acquisition protocols promise to maximize patient throughput and capture essential kinetic data, while diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and artificial intelligence (AI) aim to enhance diagnostic specificity and workflow efficiency. The review also considers contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) as a growing alternative for patients unable to undergo MRI. As evidence evolves, the integration of these technologies points toward a future of precision medicine, where breast imaging is rigorously tailored to individual patient risk and biological profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.