Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42170577›Full record

ReviewTranslational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer2026

Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer management: current applications, limitations, and future directions.

Daniel C Sasson, Arielle L Sasson, Donna A Eckstein, Laurie R Margolies

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel C SassonDivision of Interventional Radiology, Rochester Regional Health, Rochester, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9049-2250
Arielle L SassonDepartment of Diagnostic, Molecular, and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Donna A EcksteinDepartment of Diagnostic, Molecular, and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Laurie R MargoliesDepartment of Diagnostic, Molecular, and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a cornerstone of breast cancer management, demonstrating superior sensitivity compared to mammography and ultrasound, particularly for high-risk screening and the evaluation of dense breast tissue. Beyond detection, MRI provides critical physiologic and anatomical assessment essential for accurate staging, visualizing invasive lobular carcinoma, and identifying multifocal or multicentric disease. It also plays a vital role in monitoring therapeutic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by distinguishing between concentric tumor shrinkage and fragmentation, a distinction that directly influences surgical eligibility. Despite these diagnostic advantages, the indications for preoperative MRI remain controversial. This review examines the tension between MRI's utility in surgical planning-specifically its association with reduced positive margins and lower re-excision rates-and concerns regarding overdiagnosis, increased mastectomy rates, and false-positive findings. Logistical barriers to widespread adoption, including cost-effectiveness, gadolinium concerns, and the need for standardized interpretation protocols, are also discussed. Finally, the article highlights transformative advancements designed to address these limitations. Technologies such as abbreviated (AB-MRI) and ultrafast acquisition protocols promise to maximize patient throughput and capture essential kinetic data, while diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and artificial intelligence (AI) aim to enhance diagnostic specificity and workflow efficiency. The review also considers contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) as a growing alternative for patients unable to undergo MRI. As evidence evolves, the integration of these technologies points toward a future of precision medicine, where breast imaging is rigorously tailored to individual patient risk and biological profiles.

Indexed as

Breast cancerdiagnosismagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)preoperative planningscreening

Identifiers

PMID42170577
PMCPMC13187550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.