Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42170561›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026

Daily behavioral grazing patterns of beef cattle: continuous stocking grazing

Andrea Confessore, Chiara Aquilani, Maria Chiara Fabbri, Pier Attilio Accorsi, Carolina Pugliese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrea ConfessoreDepartment of Agriculture, food, environment, and forestry (DAGRI), Università di Firenze, Via delle Cascine 5, Firenze, 50144 FI, Italy.
Chiara AquilaniDepartment of Agriculture, food, environment, and forestry (DAGRI), Università di Firenze, Via delle Cascine 5, Firenze, 50144 FI, Italy.
Maria Chiara FabbriDepartment of Agriculture, food, environment, and forestry (DAGRI), Università di Firenze, Via delle Cascine 5, Firenze, 50144 FI, Italy.
Pier Attilio AccorsiDipartimento di Scienze Mediche Veterinarie, Università di Bologna, Via Tolara di Sopra 50, Ozzano Emilia, 40064 BO, Italy.
Carolina PuglieseDepartment of Agriculture, food, environment, and forestry (DAGRI), Università di Firenze, Via delle Cascine 5, Firenze, 50144 FI, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual fencing is an innovative technology for managing grazing cattle using GNSS collars. Animals were contained through a paired stimulus: when they approach a virtual boundary, the collar emits audio warnings, followed, if ignored, by an electrical pulse as aversive stimuli. This study evaluated whether different grazing management systems and the use of virtual fencing affect the daily activity behavior of Limousine cows under seasonal grazing. Two groups of 13 cows each were managed for 36 days respectively under: i) continuous stocking on a 15-ha pasture (CSG), and ii) by strip grazing (SG) using Nofence® collars to gradually expand areas according to forage availability (five boundary shifts, P1-P5). Each cow wore Allflex® smart ear-tags recording time spent grazing, ruminating, and resting. Data were analyzed with a generalized linear mixed effect model, including group (CSG, SG), period (P1-P5), and time slot (00:00-04:00, 04:00-08:00, 08:00-12:00, 12:00-16:00, 16:00-20:00, 20:00-00:00) as fixed effects, and distance traveled, temperature, and gestation day as covariates. Animal and day were random effects. Hair cortisol content was also analyzed as chronic stress indicator. SG managed with virtual fencing did not affect the overall time spent grazing, ruminating, or resting, which was similar between groups. However, a significant triple interaction indicated behavioral shifts: SG cows ruminated more during the night and early afternoon, grazing mainly in the late afternoon and evening, while CSG cows showed the opposite pattern. SG managed with virtual fencing could optimize pasture management without altering physiological behaviors or increasing chronic stress measured by hair cortisol content.

Indexed as

Activity budgetsBehavioral daily patternCattleHair cortisol contentPrecision livestock farmingSmart ear-tag sensor

Identifiers

PMID42170561
PMCPMC13187581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.