ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2026
Standardized Patient Simulation as an Effective Tool for Teaching Gastrointestinal Bleeding to Preclinical Medical Students.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Medical simulations are a well-established educational tool, allowing students hands on practice before starting clinical practice. In this study, we created a medical simulation to guide preclinical first-year medical students through a gastrointestinal (GI) bleed patient encounter. Our objective was to evaluate the educational impact of simulation cases, particularly in the context of GI pre-clinical medical education. Methods: Students participated in a standardized patient (SP) simulation of a patient with abdominal discomfort and rectal bleeding suggestive of cirrhosis. Sixteen sessions with two SPs were facilitated by five GI attendings and fellows. Student teams performed history-taking, physical examination, differential diagnosis, and management of a dynamically evolving, critically ill patient. Following the simulation, facilitators led a debrief linking clinical findings to preclinical pathophysiology. Students completed post-simulation surveys assessing perceived skills and learning. Results: Seventy-seven students participated; 63 were included in analysis. Sixty-three percent were female. Students demonstrated significant improvement in perceived history and physical exam skills (pre: 3.23±1.06 vs post: 4.21±0.58, P<0.01) and in developing differential diagnoses (pre: 3.02±0.91 vs post: 4.13±0.61, P<0.01). Ninety-seven percent reported improved understanding of GI bleeding. Additionally, 83% preferred more simulation-based learning prior to clerkships, and 83% desired more GI-focused simulations during clerkship. Discussion: This simulation case proved to be an effective tool to enhance pre-clinical medical students' abilities to understand and manage GI bleeding. The simulation allowed for the realistic practice of critical clinical skills while demonstrating to students the relevance of their pre-clinical learning. The perceived improvements observed in knowledge and confidence suggest that integrating simulation-based training early into the medical curriculum could improve the transition from theoretical learning to clinical practice. Future studies should evaluate long-term skill retention and impact on clinical performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.