Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42170530›Full record

ArticleCardiology research and practice2026

Comparing the Performances of Support Vector Machines and Artificial Neural Networks for Predicting Coronary Artery Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Sahar Shariatnia, Abdolhalim Rajabi, Majid Ziaratban, Aref Salehi, Mohammadali Vakili

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sahar ShariatniaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran, mums.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8314-2933
Abdolhalim RajabiDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health, Golestan University of Medica Science, Gorgan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0698-8166
Majid ZiaratbanDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Golestan University, Gorgan, Iran, gu.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4560-4759
Aref SalehiIschemic Disorders Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran, goums.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7116-0309
Mohammadali VakiliDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health, Golestan University of Medica Science, Gorgan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9867-0031

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is recognized as an inflammatory condition and remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Cardiovascular disease (CVD), more broadly, is a major contributor to global death and disability. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of various noninvasive techniques for detecting CAD. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 758 participants, including 508 patients diagnosed with CAD and 250 without the disease. The diagnostic performance of two machine learning models-artificial neural networks (ANNs) and support vector machines (SVMs)-was evaluated. The classification models were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy. Results: The study included a total of 758 participants. Among them, 250 individuals (33.6% male and 66.4% female) were diagnosed as non-CAD cases, while 508 participants (64% male, 36% female) were identified as having CAD. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for CAD prediction was 0.752 (95% CI: 0.682-0.823) using the ANN model and 0.793 (95% CI: 0.733-0.853) using the SVM model. A statistically significant difference was observed between the performance of the two models in predicting CAD ( Conclusions: SVMs demonstrated superior performance compared to ANNs in predicting the risk of CAD using simple clinical predictors.

Indexed as

artificial neural network (ANN)coronary artery diseasepredictionsupport vector machines (SVMs)

Identifiers

PMID42170530
PMCPMC13189446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.