Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42170500›Full record

ArticleJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology2026

Distress Screening in a Cancer Survivorship Clinic: Impact on Psychosocial Referrals.

Heather Sloan, Sarah J Jennings, Kristi Adair, Anne Stein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heather SloanFrom School of Nursing, Northern Michigan University, Marquette, Michigan.
Sarah J JenningsFrom School of Nursing, Northern Michigan University, Marquette, Michigan.
Kristi AdairFrom School of Nursing, Northern Michigan University, Marquette, Michigan.
Anne SteinFrom School of Nursing, Northern Michigan University, Marquette, Michigan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head and neck cancer is a life-changing experience. Treatment can be single-modality or multimodality therapy, including surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, or clinical trials. All cancer survivors experience distress, but head and neck cancer survivors are more likely to experience it due to the bodily functions affected by this disease. Distress screening is now a part of routine cancer care at diagnosis, treatment, and pivotal times of the journey. However, in a survivorship clinic in this study, a distress screening tool was not implemented at routine follow-up appointments after completing treatment. Head and neck cancer survivors were followed for cancer surveillance by specialists or primary care providers on a 6- to 12-month basis, where patients could routinely self-report any distress. The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project was to determine how the use of a distress screening tool over a 12-week period affected referrals for psychosocial needs among head and neck cancer patients who were 2 or more years post-treatment. The sample consisted of head and neck cancer survivors in a survivorship clinic (

Identifiers

PMID42170500
PMCPMC13189013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.