Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42170438›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2026

A novel disposable intrauterine infusion catheter reduces pain and shortens procedure time compared to a conventional balloon-tipped catheter in sonohysterography: a retrospective cohort study.

Ling Ruan, Linjing Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ling RuanDepartment of Ultrasound Imaging, Jingmen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Jingmen 448000, Hubei, China.
Linjing YangDepartment of Ultrasound Imaging, Jingmen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Jingmen 448000, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare pain scores and complication rates between a novel disposable intrauterine infusion catheter (Yikai Medical) and a conventional balloon-tipped 12F double-lumen catheter during hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy).

methodsThis single-center retrospective cohort study included 128 infertile women who underwent HyCoSy between January 2022 and June 2023. Patients were divided into observation group (disposable catheter, n = 64) and control group (balloon catheter, n = 64). Primary outcomes were Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores (intraoperative, 30 min, 2 h postoperative) and complication rates. Secondary outcomes included procedure time and imaging success rate. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of pain.

resultsBaseline characteristics were generally comparable between the groups, although patients in the observation group were slightly younger (P = 0.041). VAS scores were significantly lower in the observation group at all time points (all P<0.001). Overall complication rate was lower in the observation group (15.6% vs. 29.7%) but not statistically significant (P = 0.091). Procedure time was shorter in the observation group (8.28 ± 1.44 vs. 10.49 ± 2.32 min, P<0.001). Imaging success was similar (100% vs. 98.4%, P = 1.000). Catheter type was an independent predictor of moderate-to-severe pain (OR = 0.115, 95% CI 0.050-0.267, P<0.001).

conclusionThe disposable intrauterine infusion catheter significantly reduces pain and procedure time during HyCoSy compared to the conventional balloon-tipped catheter, with comparable imaging success and a trend toward fewer complications.

Indexed as

cathetercomplicationsHysterosalpingo-contrast sonographypainretrospective study

Identifiers

PMID42170438
PMCPMC13186768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.