ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2026
Application of low position percutaneous puncture plus rectus abdominis anterior sheath tunnel operation for peritoneal dialysis catheterization of end-stage renal disease.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPeritoneal dialysis (PD) is a key treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD), with catheter placement being crucial for success. This study evaluates the effectiveness of low-position percutaneous puncture combined with the rectus abdominis anterior sheath tunnel (LPCCISTT) technique, comparing it to traditional open abdominal catheter placement (OACP).
methodsThis retrospective study included 420 ESRD patients that came from Liaocheng People's Hospital between the months of January 2020 and February 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: 180 underwent LPCCISTT and 240 received OACP. Data on operative details, recovery, complications, and survival outcome of PD catheter were analyzed. Surgical indicators included incision length, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and complications. Recovery outcomes focused on length of hospital stay, and postoperative pain.
resultsThe LPCCISTT group demonstrated significantly shorter incisions, reduced operative time, and less blood loss compared to the OACP group (
conclusionLPCCISTT is a safer and more effective method than OACP. It has shorter operation time, faster patient recovery, fewer complications, and makes better use of hospital resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.