ArticleBiomedical engineering education2026
Promoting Self-Efficacy of Biomedical Engineering Undergraduate Students Using a Deliberately Designed Nanomedicine Workshop Series.
Article in Biomedical engineering education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Challenge: Biomedical engineering students often have limited exposure to authentic laboratory research early in their academic programs, which can impact their understanding of professional practice and reduce confidence in their ability to participate meaningfully in research. Common barriers to undergraduate research including time commitments, prerequisite training, and uncertainty about expectations can disproportionately limit early engagement, particularly for first-year students. Novel Initiative: To address this challenge, we developed and implemented a nanomedicine-focused workshop series designed to provide early, low-stakes laboratory exposure for first-year BME students. The series consisted of three approximately two-hour workshops that combined brief conceptual introductions with guided, hands-on activities centered on lipid-based nanoparticles. Students synthesized fluorescent liposomes, purified and characterized the formulations, and examined liposome-cell interactions using fluorescence microscopy. The workshops were intentionally scaffolded and time-limited to lower barriers to participation while supporting the development of core laboratory skills, self-efficacy, and research identity. Reflection: Following participation in the workshop series, students demonstrated increased confidence in performing laboratory tasks and stronger identification as researchers. These outcomes suggest that short, structured laboratory experiences can serve as a practical and scalable mechanism for supporting early research readiness and professional practice skill development. Collectively, this work highlights the potential for brief, authentic lab experiences to complement traditional curricula and promote confidence, engagement, and early professional formation in biomedical engineering students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.