ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Effectiveness of Task-Trainer Simulation Versus Peer Education on Nursing Students' Learning Outcomes in Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Learning mechanical ventilation principles can reduce patient complications. This study examined the effects of task-trainer simulation and peer education on nursing students' knowledge, clinical performance, and action speed related to basic principles of mechanical ventilation (BPMV). Methods: This three-arm randomized controlled trial (2023-2024) included 60 students in Tehran, Iran. Students who were purposively selected and randomly assigned to task-trainer simulator training (n=20), peer education (n=20), and control (n=20) groups. BPMV was taught to the first group using a task-trainer simulator by a researcher, and to the second by two trained peer students. Data were collected using validated knowledge and skill assessment tools for BPMV. Results: The students' knowledge ( Conclusion: Both task-trainer simulation and peer-based, student-centered training improve nursing students' knowledge, performance, and response speed in managing BPMV. However, simulation leads to faster, immediate action and greater overall gains than peer education in this setting. It is recommended to use these useful methods to increase learning outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.