In one paragraphArticle in PhytoKeys, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
6 authors.
Yuan FangCollege of Life Sciences, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541006, Guangxi, China Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and the Chinese Academy of Sciences Guilin China https://ror.org/00ff97g12.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3637-0762 Bo PanGuangxi Key Laboratory of Plant Conservation and Restoration Ecology in Karst Terrain, Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin 541006, Guangxi, China Guangxi Normal University Guilin China https://ror.org/02frt9q65.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0996-524X Peng-Wei LiGuangxi Key Laboratory of Plant Conservation and Restoration Ecology in Karst Terrain, Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin 541006, Guangxi, China Guangxi Normal University Guilin China https://ror.org/02frt9q65.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8195-1478 Xin-Mei QinGuangxi Key Laboratory of Plant Conservation and Restoration Ecology in Karst Terrain, Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin 541006, Guangxi, China Guangxi Normal University Guilin China https://ror.org/02frt9q65.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9977-254X Qiang ZhangGuangxi Key Laboratory of Plant Conservation and Restoration Ecology in Karst Terrain, Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin 541006, Guangxi, China Guangxi Normal University Guilin China https://ror.org/02frt9q65.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2217-2407 Yong-Bin LuGuangxi Key Laboratory of Plant Conservation and Restoration Ecology in Karst Terrain, Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin 541006, Guangxi, China Guangxi Normal University Guilin China https://ror.org/02frt9q65.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8635-3354 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
A new species of Gesneriaceae,
Indexed as
Hemiboea siccinvolucrismolecular phylogenymorphologynew speciestaxonomy
Identifiers
PMID42170301
PMCPMC13187851
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390