ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2026
Consolidative thoracic radiotherapy after first-line chemoimmunotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (cTRT) is standard after chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), its role in the immunotherapy era remains unclear, and this study provides real-world evidence on its survival benefit and safety. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC who underwent first-line chemoimmunotherapy from January 2019 to October 2024. Participants were stratified by receipt of cTRT. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), thoracic relapse, extrathoracic relapse lesions, and treatment-related adverse events. Survival analyses were performed using a 3-month landmark cohort as the primary analytical approach, with propensity score matching and time-dependent Cox regression as sensitivity analyses, and robustness assessed by E-value. Results: Among 171 patients (cTRT, n=91; non-cTRT, n=80; median follow-up 41.3 months), cTRT significantly improved median OS [13.4 Conclusions: The survival benefit of cTRT established in the chemotherapy era is preserved in the immunotherapy era, with higher radiation doses potentially improving PFS and GLR emerging as a potential prognostic biomarker, warranting prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.