ReviewSubstance abuse and rehabilitation2026
What Do Thirty Years of Neuroimaging Research Tell Us About Recreational Cannabis Use and Brain Integrity? A Narrative Review of the Multimodal Neuroimaging Evidence to Date.
Review in Substance abuse and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The consumption of cannabinoids is highly prevalent and has been associated with altered structural, functional, and metabolic brain integrity, measured using PET and neuroimaging tools. However, the current neuroimaging evidence has been summarized by distinct modalities that measure different metrics of brain integrity, precluding a comprehensive understanding of the underlying neurobiology. A non-systematic narrative review method was used to summarize the multimodal neuroimaging evidence on brain integrity from experimental studies of cannabinoid intoxication and observational studies in non-intoxicated cannabis users. Consistent evidence showed that acute intoxication with delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) was associated with greater brain activity in fronto-striatal pathways. For regular cannabis users compared to controls, there was consistent cross-sectional evidence of lower hippocampal volumetry and white matter microstructure of the superior longitudinal fasciculus, and of different fronto-striatal activity and connectivity during cue-reactivity tasks and resting-state. In cannabis users, there was emerging evidence from Positron Emission Tomography studies of altered neurochemistry in fronto-striatal pathways (eg, lower N-acetyl aspartate); lower glucose metabolism in the frontal cortex; and lower density of cannabinoid receptors, which may reverse with abstinence. Longitudinal multimodal neuroimaging studies are required to confirm if brain differences predate or follow the onset of cannabis use or cannabis use disorder, and whether changes in brain integrity in people who use cannabis dissipate with abstinence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.