ArticleBJR artificial intelligence2026
Development and evaluation of artificial intelligence tools to estimate volumetric breast density from processed 2D mammograms.
Article in BJR artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise for estimating volumetric breast density values from processed, "for presentation," mammograms. However, previous evaluations have typically used small datasets or focused on a single vendor. In this study, we aimed to improve volumetric breast density estimation from processed mammograms for the three main UK vendors with a combination of improved training methods and the utilization of up-to-date data from the large OPTIMAM Mammography Image Database (OMI-DB). Methods: Paired processed/unprocessed mammograms were obtained from OMI-DB. Ground-truth, image-level density values were calculated by passing unprocessed images through a commercial density estimation tool. AI tools, comprising feed-forward convolution neural networks, were then trained to reproduce these values from the corresponding processed mammograms. Results: Patient-level AI predictions for volumetric breast density demonstrated strong correlation with ground-truth values derived from unprocessed image counterparts ( Conclusions: The presented models demonstrated good performance overall and were generally consistent across screening sites. Advances in knowledge: The presented AI tools provide a means of estimating breast density from processed mammograms, enabling further research into breast cancer epidemiology and risk where only processed mammograms are available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.