Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42170207›Full record

ArticleBJR artificial intelligence2026

Development and evaluation of artificial intelligence tools to estimate volumetric breast density from processed 2D mammograms.

Sam Ellis, Sandra Gomes, Mark D Halling-Brown, Kenneth C Young, Lucy M Warren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJR artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sam EllisDepartment of Scientific Computing, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford GU2 7XX, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3946-1464
Sandra GomesDepartment of Scientific Computing, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford GU2 7XX, United Kingdom.
Mark D Halling-BrownDepartment of Scientific Computing, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford GU2 7XX, United Kingdom.
Kenneth C YoungNational Co-ordinating Centre for the Physics of Mammography, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford GU2 7XX, United Kingdom.
Lucy M WarrenDepartment of Scientific Computing, Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford GU2 7XX, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promise for estimating volumetric breast density values from processed, "for presentation," mammograms. However, previous evaluations have typically used small datasets or focused on a single vendor. In this study, we aimed to improve volumetric breast density estimation from processed mammograms for the three main UK vendors with a combination of improved training methods and the utilization of up-to-date data from the large OPTIMAM Mammography Image Database (OMI-DB). Methods: Paired processed/unprocessed mammograms were obtained from OMI-DB. Ground-truth, image-level density values were calculated by passing unprocessed images through a commercial density estimation tool. AI tools, comprising feed-forward convolution neural networks, were then trained to reproduce these values from the corresponding processed mammograms. Results: Patient-level AI predictions for volumetric breast density demonstrated strong correlation with ground-truth values derived from unprocessed image counterparts ( Conclusions: The presented models demonstrated good performance overall and were generally consistent across screening sites. Advances in knowledge: The presented AI tools provide a means of estimating breast density from processed mammograms, enabling further research into breast cancer epidemiology and risk where only processed mammograms are available.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebreast density estimationmammography

Identifiers

PMID42170207
PMCPMC13187629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.