ArticleCureus2026
Implementation and Evaluation of an Emergency Department-Based Procedure Task Trainer Cart: A Mixed Methods Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Teaching procedural skills in the emergency department (ED) can be challenging. To support on-shift procedural training in a busy adult academic ED setting, a dedicated modular cart containing simulation-based procedure task trainers and supplies was created and placed into the clinical space. Methods Uptake among ED providers was assessed via the number of logged cart accesses over time. The educational impact of increased availability of simulation equipment on shift was assessed using pre- and post-intervention surveys of cart users and semi-structured interviews with resident physician cart users. Results Use of the trainer cart was initially robust at 13 uses per month, but decreased significantly to one to two uses per month after the initial pilot phase. Pre- and post-survey data, while underpowered, indicated trends in on-shift training time and a preference for using equipment with near peers rather than for solo practice. Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews revealed the following three themes around the perceived utility of task trainers: (1) "practice makes perfect," (2) "applications beyond the tool," and (3) "limitations, barriers, and solutions." Conclusion Making simulation-based procedure training more conveniently accessible and closer to real-world practice by placing a task trainer cart in the clinical setting was well-received by clinicians when it was used. Interviews offered rich insights into specific improvements for future iterations of the cart and added understanding of how similar interventions may fit into the longitudinal learning curve of procedural skill acquisition and maintenance among emergency medicine trainees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.