Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42170140›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Outcomes of Mohs Micrographic Surgery Compared to Wide Local Excision for Malignant Melanoma and Melanoma In Situ.

Dora R Goldstein, Ryan S Koch, Radwa Emam, Kevin T Nguyen, Justin Raman, Floyd A Pirtle, Leor Daniel Goldstein, Michelle Tarbox, Kritin K Verma, Alba Posligua

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dora R GoldsteinSchool of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, USA.
Ryan S KochDepartment of Internal Medicine, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple, Temple, USA.
Radwa EmamCollege of Medicine, Texas A&M College of Medicine, Bryan, USA.
Kevin T NguyenSchool of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA.
Justin RamanDepartment of Dermatology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA.
Floyd A PirtleDepartment of Dermatology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA.
Leor Daniel GoldsteinDepartment of Public Health, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA.
Michelle TarboxDepartment of Dermatology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA.
Kritin K VermaSchool of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA.
Alba PosliguaDepartment of Dermatology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), traditionally used for non-melanoma skin cancers, has been used for some cases of melanoma. Using the TriNetX (TriNetX, LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA) database, two analyses were performed. The first compared wide local excision (WLE) and MMS for the management of malignant melanoma (MM) of the face, scalp, and neck. The second analysis compared WLE and melanoma in situ (MIS) of the same anatomical areas. WLE was associated with a significantly higher incidence of secondary and unspecified malignant neoplasms of the lymph nodes of the head and neck and secondary malignant neoplasm of the bone, lung, and brain in the MM analysis. In the MIS analysis, WLE was found to have higher rates of secondary malignant neoplasms of the head and neck, bone, lung, and brain. The post-operative complication rates were similar between the MMS and WLE groups in both analyses.

Indexed as

facial skin cancermelanomamohs micrographic surgerysurgical outcomeswide local excision

Identifiers

PMID42170140
PMCPMC13189700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.