ArticleCureus2026
Modified Fricke's Cheek Flap for Periorbital Reconstruction: A Regional Alternative to Forehead-Based Flaps.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPeriorbital reconstruction remains challenging due to the region's complex anatomy and essential roles in eyelid function, globe protection, and facial aesthetics. Traditional reconstructive options, such as forehead-based Fricke's flaps, may result in eyebrow distortion and poor color match. The modified Fricke's cheek flap offers a regional alternative with improved mobility, vascularity, and aesthetic integration. This study evaluates flap survival, functional eyelid outcomes, aesthetic results, and complications of this technique in traumatic periorbital defects. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted at Shri B.M. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India, from January 2024 to January 2025. Twenty male patients with traumatic periorbital soft-tissue loss who underwent reconstruction using the modified Fricke's cheek flap performed by a single surgeon were included in the study. Data collected included demographics, defect characteristics, presence of fractures, flap viability, functional outcomes, cosmetic results, and postoperative complications.
resultsRoad traffic accidents accounted for 18 (90%) of injuries. Superficial tissue loss occurred in all patients, while deep tissue loss was present in four (20%) patients. Associated fractures were identified in two (10%) patients. Complete flap survival was achieved in 18 (90%), with two (10%) patients developing partial distal flap necrosis, both managed conservatively. No infection, hematoma, ectropion, or wound dehiscence occurred. All patients maintained intact eyelid closure and stable contour. Donor-site morbidity was minimal, and cosmetic outcomes were clinically assessed as satisfactory in all patients, with scars concealed along natural facial creases.
conclusionThe modified Fricke's cheek flap appears to be a reliable and versatile option for periorbital reconstruction, demonstrating high flap survival and preserved eyelid function in this cohort. While it provides a favorable color and texture match, claims of superiority over forehead-based flaps require further comparative validation. Further comparative studies are warranted to better define its role among regional reconstructive options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.