ArticleRSC advances2026
Terminal group engineering of A-DA'D-A non-fullerene acceptors as electron transport materials for efficient inverted perovskite solar cells.
Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional fullerene-based electron transport materials (ETMs) suffer from limited tunability and suboptimal interfacial contact, hindering further efficiency improvements in inverted perovskite solar cells (PSCs). In this study, two non-fullerene small molecules with chlorinated thiophene terminal groups Cl24-TCl and difluorinated phenyl terminal groups Cl24-F were employed as ETMs in inverted PSCs to investigate the key factors by which different terminal groups influence device performance. Although the Cl24-TCl ETM exhibits a more polarized electrostatic potential distribution and a larger dipole moment, the Cl24-F ETM shows more favorable energy level alignment and interfacial contact, which effectively reduce interfacial charge recombination losses. In addition, Cl24-F displays more compact π-π stacking, resulting in higher electron mobility and conductivity, thereby promoting more efficient interfacial charge transport. Consequently, inverted PSCs based on Cl24-F achieve a champion efficiency of 24.18%, which is significantly higher than that of devices based on Cl24-TCl (13.02%). This work uncovers the key factors governing device performance and guides the design of high-performance non-fullerene ETMs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.